Contact the librarian to discuss search support requirements for your systematic review or submit a literature search request form.
A systematic review is a protocol-driven, comprehensive literature review, designed to answer a well defined question. It involves using a specific research methodology with internationally accepted characteristics.
The key characteristics of a systematic review are:
Systematic reviews may also contain meta-analyses. Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analyses can provide more precise estimates of the effects of health care than those derived from the individual studies included within a review (see The Cochrane Handbook Chapter 10). They also facilitate investigations of the consistency of evidence across studies, and the exploration of differences across studies.
Citation: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0
Acknowledgement - much of the content in this guide has been adapted / copied from the Yale University's Harvey Cushing / John Hay Whitney Medical Library's guide on systematic reviews and other comprehensive searching guide.
Grey literature is “information produced by all levels of government, academics, business and industry in electronic and print formats not controlled by commercial publishing”, (GreyNet) and includes materials such as theses and dissertations, working papers, policy statements, technical reports and government documents.
Why include grey literature in your review?
For completeness. Whilst it is rarely peer-reviewed, grey literature is often a good source of the most up-to-date information on a topic. Including it reduces publication bias and it may be the only source of some data.
The AACODS checklist is a useful method to quickly evaluate grey literature. Authority Accuracy Coverage Objectivity Date Significance Tyndall, J. AACODS Checklist. Flinders University, 2010.